New Technologies
New Wind Turbine to Hit Market in 2012
WHY WE BELIEVE IN THE VERTICAL-AXIS WIND TURBINE (VAWT)
With energy prices spiraling out of control, many businesses are searching for ways to reduce and control energy costs. It is a trend that is also fostering a great deal of interest in renewable-energy options. Wind power is the fastest growing alternative energy segment. It provides an attractive cost structure relative to other alternative energy and distributed generation solutions, such as cogeneration and solar power.
The wind power market has been dominated by large horizontal wind turbines. They have the traditional blade design that looks like a giant fan clustered mostly on “wind farms” located in rural areas. These large systems seriously compromise the ability of many companies to take advantage of wind power right at their building or plant. This is due to the economics of horizontal wind turbines that favor large units, multiple-megawatt installations and current technology dynamics.
However, new technology has come on line that breaks this mold — the vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT). It addresses a number of the technology’s known shortcomings, such as noise pollution, minimum blade speed threshold, bird endangerment and space limitation, while enhancing its advantages.
System Design
The vertical-axis design is a compact turbine design that can be sited on location without being intrusive and has been designed to be integrated directly into existing buildings. This size advantage allows structures as small as an office building or as large as a hospital for onsite installation.
Economically, onsite installations dramatically improve the return on investment of wind power, not to mention the rebates now in the offering. Power generated offsite, such as at wind farms, is still subject to transmission and distribution charges. Conversely, onsite solutions take a portion of the organizational power requirements “off the grid.”
Blade Speed
A traditional horizontal blade design turbine of similar size requires a greater level of wind speed to generate power. The vertical axis turbines provide omni-directional wind collection. The torque produced allows it to make power while turning at slower blade speeds.
It only takes a 5 mph wind to turn the blade. One benefit of this feature is obvious: It can work at locations with lower average wind speeds. Therefore, the geographic option for using wind energy is greatly expanded; a company may not need to be located on a hilltop or in coastal locations to reap the benefits. Plus, it reduces wind direction limitations, because it can collect wind power on a 360-degree basis. Horizontal blade technology must spend time and energy turning into the wind when the wind changes direction.
Environmental Impact
The slower blade tip speed has environmental improvements as well. First, it is very quiet when operating. Unlike traditional wind turbines, the vertical axis turbine has the blades connected at both ends, and the blades do not swing by the tower and create noise. Also, with no high-speed wing tips exposed, the vertical axis turbine has a relatively low impact on bird populations.
Courtesy: Sauer Energy
Power Your Home with Your Home


The DOW™ POWERHOUSE™ Solar Shingle was unveiled in October 2009. Since then it has been hailed as revolutionary.
But, why is our solar solution revolutionary? First, it’s a residential shingle – in both its installation technique and in the roofing protection it provides. In addition, it generates solar electricity by integrating solar cells into the design. In other words, the shingle is the solar panel, and the solar panel is the shingle.
While they are not yet commercially available, we’re moving along and getting closer to having the DOW™ POWERHOUSE™ SOLAR SHINGLE on U.S. rooftops sometime in 2011. But, we’re not waiting until then to show them off.
Earlier this summer, Dow partnered with Cobblestone Homes to build Michigan’s first Net Zero Energy House using an entire portfolio of Dow’s building materials, including our solar shingles.. You can see them in action, and see what goes into making a home Net Zero Energy, at www.visionzerohome.com.
A Concrete Cure
for Global Warming?
A new technique could turn cement from a source of climate changing greenhouse gases into a way to remove them from the air
By David Biello
The turbines at Moss Landing power plant on the California coast burn through natural gas to pump out more than 1,000 megawatts of electric power. The 700-degree Fahrenheit (370-degree Celsius) fumes left over contain at least 30,000 parts per million of carbon dioxide (CO2)—the primary greenhouse gas responsible for global warming—along with other pollutants.
Today, this flue gas wafts up and out of the power plant’s enormous smokestacks, but by simply bubbling it through the nearby seawater, a new California-based company called Calera says it can use more than 90 percent of that CO2 to make something useful: cement.
It’s a twist that could make a polluting substance into a way to reduce greenhouse gases. Cement, which is mostly commonly composed of calcium silicates, requires heating limestone and other ingredients to 2,640 degrees F (1,450 degrees C) by burning fossil fuels and is the third largest source of greenhouse gas pollution in the U.S., according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Making one ton of cement results in the emission of roughly one ton of CO2—and in some cases much more.
While Calera’s process of making calcium carbonate cement wouldn’t eliminate all CO2 emissions, it would reverse that equation. “For every ton of cement we make, we are sequestering half a ton of CO2,” says crystallographer Brent Constantz, founder of Calera. “We probably have the best carbon capture and storage technique there is by a long shot.”
Carbon capture and storage has been identified by experts ranging from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to the leaders of the world’s eight richest nations (G8) as crucial to the fight against climate change. The idea is to capture the CO2 and other greenhouse gases produced when burning fossil fuels, such as coal or natural gas, and then permanently store it, such as in deep-sea basalt formations.
Calera’s process takes the idea a step forward by storing the CO2 in a useful product. The U.S. used more than 122 million metric tons of Portland cement in 2006, according to the Portland Cement Association (PCA), an industry group, and China used at least 800 million metric tons.
The Calera process essentially mimics marine cement, which is produced by coral when making their shells and reefs, taking the calcium and magnesium in seawater and using it to form carbonates at normal temperatures and pressures. “We are turning CO2 into carbonic acid and then making carbonate,” Constantz says. “All we need is water and pollution.”
The company employs spray dryers that utilize the heat in the flue gas to dry the slurry that results from mixing the water and pollution. “A gas-fired power plant is basically like attaching a jet engine to the ground,” Constantz notes. “We use the waste heat of the flue gas. They’re just shooting it up into the atmosphere anyway.”
In essence, the company is making chalk, and that’s the color of the resulting cement: snow white. Once dried, the Calera cement can be used as a replacement for the Portland cement that is typically blended with rock and other material to make the concrete in everything from roads to buildings. “We think since we’re making the cement out of CO2, the more you use, the better,” says Constantz, who formerly made medical cements. “Make that wall five feet thick, sequester CO2, and be cooler in summer, warmer in winter and more seismically stable. Or make a road twice as thick.”
Of course, Calera isn’t the only company pursuing this idea—just the most advanced. Carbon Sciences in Santa Barbara, Calif., plans to use flue gas and the water leftover after mining operations, so-called mine slime, which is often rich in magnesium and calcium, to create similar cements. Halifax, Nova Scotia–based Carbon Sense Solutions plans to accelerate the natural process of cement absorbing CO2 by exposing a fresh batch to flue gas. And a number of companies are working on reducing the energy needs of Portland cement making. The key will be ensuring that such specialty cements have the same properties and the same or lower cost than Portland cement, says Carbon Sciences president and CEO Derek McLeish.
But the companies may also find it challenging to get their cements approved by regulators and, more importantly, accepted by the building trade, says civil engineer Steven Kosmatka of the Portland Cement Association. “The construction industry is very conservative,” he adds. “It took PCA about 25 years to get the standards changed to allow 5 percent limestone [in the Portland cement mix]. So things move kind of slowly.”
Calera hopes to get over that hurdle quickly by first offering a blend of its carbon-storing cement and Portland cement, which would not initially store any extra greenhouse gases but would at least balance out the emissions from making the traditional mortar. “It’s just a little better than carbon neutral,” notes Constantz, who will make his case to the industry at large at the World of Concrete trade fair in February. “That alone is a huge step forward.”
“Could you take this calcium carbonate and add it to Portland cement? You sure can,” Kosmatka says. “Could you add it to the ready mix to replace some of the Portland cement? You probably can do that, too.” That would help to rein in the greenhouse gas emissions from buildings—both from building them and powering them once they are built—that makes up 48 percent of U.S. global warming pollution.
Nor are there any limitations on the raw materials of the Calera cement: Seawater containing billions of tons of calcium and magnesium covers 70 percent of the planet and the 2,775 power plants in the U.S. alone pumped out 2.5 billion metric tons of CO2 in 2006. The process results in seawater that is stripped of calcium and magnesium—ideal for desalinization technologies—but safe to be dumped back into the ocean. And attaching the Calera process to the nation’s more than 600 coal-fired power plants or even steel mills and other industrial sources is even more attractive as burning coal results in flue gas with as much as 150,000 parts per million of CO2.
But Calera is starting with the cleanest fossil fuel—natural gas. The company has set up a pilot plant at Moss Landing because California is soon to adopt regulations limiting the amount of CO2 power plants and other sources can emit, and natural gas is the primary fuel of power plants in that state. According to Constantz, some flue gas is already running through the company’s process. “We are using emissions from gas-fired generation as our CO2 source at the pilot plant where we are making up to 10 tons a day,” he says. “That material will be used for evaluations.”
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has expressed interest in testing the cement, and Dynegy, owner of the Moss Landing power plant, is also intrigued. Although no formal agreement has been struck, “their proposed technology for capturing CO2 from flue gases and turning it into a beneficial, marketable product sounds very interesting to us,” Dynegy spokesman David Byford says. “There are very good technologies for capturing the emissions of other pollutants. The carbon issue is something we are just turning our attention to now, and so far it’s
been quite elusive.”
Courtesy Scientific American.com

20 Comments to “New Technologies”
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI



By Zonalibre, February 26, 2010 @ 1:44 PM
I am brand-new to blogging and actually enjoyed your site. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking you out. Thanks for sharing.
By Compras Panama, February 27, 2010 @ 11:17 AM
It is nice to definitely find a web site where the blogger is sophisticated.
By Shon Zona Libre, February 27, 2010 @ 9:31 PM
I recently came accross your site and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my very first comment. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this website very often.
By Corine Spake, March 24, 2010 @ 4:45 AM
Well said! If I could write like this I would be well happy. The more I see articles of such quality as this (which is rare), the more I think there might be a future for the Net. Keep it up, as it were.
By Adella Asbell, April 10, 2010 @ 1:13 AM
This is a wonderful blog, I discovered your webpage browsing google for a similar subject matter and arrived to this. I couldnt find to much alternative info on this summary, so it was pleasant to find this one. I will certainly be returning to check out some other posts that you have another time.
By Luigi Fulk, April 18, 2010 @ 8:28 AM
I found your site via yahoo thanks for the post. I will bookmark it for future reference. Thanks
By Anonymous, April 20, 2010 @ 2:24 PM
Just happened by your blog and really happy that I did. I will bookmark and be back soon, keep up the good work!
By Canal, April 25, 2010 @ 12:11 PM
Hello. Fantastic job, if I wasn’t so busy with my school work I read your total site. Thanks!
By Asha Shutes, April 29, 2010 @ 11:10 PM
Hi friend, your blog’s pattern is straightforward and clean and i love it. Your website posts are outstanding. Please retain them coming. Greets!!!
By Ladawn Stenger, May 4, 2010 @ 12:18 PM
At long last, a really good web site that’s not in my face wanting to always sell me some thing. Thank you, you need to carry on the great work.
By The Guide, May 21, 2010 @ 1:53 PM
I recently came across your website and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my very first remark. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this website very often.
By Rippelmeyer, May 21, 2010 @ 10:09 PM
Hi,Excellent blog post dude! i am just Tired of using RSS feeds and do you use twitter?so i can follow you there:D.
PS:Do you think putting video to your blog posts to keep the visitors more enjoyed?I think it works.Best wishes, Man Rippelmeyer
By Maryland Warters, August 29, 2010 @ 12:07 AM
Great information to my business
Please keep it up. I look for your posts on my iphone rss feed Just about every Day.
By John, September 10, 2010 @ 2:07 PM
hey, nice blog…really like it and added to bookmarks. keep up with good work
By Ben Relles, September 10, 2010 @ 3:53 PM
Great stuff as usual…
By robert, September 17, 2010 @ 12:15 AM
Like your blog. Sending best wishes from Viena.
By Mike, September 29, 2010 @ 8:03 AM
Fantastic blog! I really love how it is easy on my eyes as well as the facts are well written. I have bookmarked your site! Clean Energy is green energy. It will be interesting to see how the design of photovoltaic tile evolves over the next decade.
By Morris Klebanow, October 29, 2010 @ 2:31 PM
You’ve a really interesting blog here, I’ve bookmarked it and look forward to visiting in the future.
By Johnny Green, August 20, 2011 @ 9:13 PM
Great invention, This Vertical Axis Wind Turbine !
It allows a lot of flexibility for installation and more people will go for it-
By Onergy, February 26, 2012 @ 10:40 PM
Great, blog looking forward to more